ATHLIVO

The scientific sample pack and text inside the infographic images are in English. Navigation is localized; full translation is pending.

VISUAL CONTENT CONCEPTS

Research.
Made visual.

Two sample post series turn coaching questions into concise infographics. The graphics are in English; sources and limitations remain alongside the visuals.

Sample copy has general founder approval. Final scientific and visual review remains open before client use.

STRENGTH / 3 IMAGES

Does every set need to end in failure?

A review found no clear hypertrophy advantage for momentary muscular failure over non-failure training. Study definitions and stopping points matter.

01
Infographic cover asking whether every set must reach failure
01 / Question
Infographic explaining that a 15-study review found no clear hypertrophy advantage
02 / Evidence
Infographic stating two interpretation limits of the failure review
03 / Limits
Research source

Refalo et al. · systematic review and meta-analysis. The sample is a simplified educational interpretation, not an individual training prescription.

TRAINING FREQUENCY / 3 IMAGES

More days, more muscle?

Compare weekly training volume before attributing a change in muscle growth to the number of training days.

02
Infographic asking whether more training days means more muscle
01 / Question
Conceptual diagram showing equal weekly work distributed over two or four days; not study data
02 / Illustration
Infographic summarizing a 25-study volume-matched frequency review and its limits
03 / Evidence
Research source

Schoenfeld, Grgic & Krieger · 2019 review. The chart is conceptual, not study data. The finding concerns muscle growth and should not be assumed for every performance outcome.

Original studio sample graphics · AI-assisted production · English-language post imagesRead the full sample pack and evidence notes ↗
@athlivo.studio